{"id":1194,"date":"2026-07-28T19:08:45","date_gmt":"2026-07-28T19:08:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194"},"modified":"2026-07-28T19:08:45","modified_gmt":"2026-07-28T19:08:45","slug":"dojs-environmental-enforcement-arm-has-been-captured-by-industry-critics-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194","title":{"rendered":"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<!-- begin partial\/series-card --><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p><i><span>Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a <\/span><\/i><i><span>quick donation<\/span><\/i><i><span>.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1192\">This Activist Was Targeted by ICE for Criticizing Colombia\u2019s President-Elect<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Tom Mariani spent nearly 40 years working as an environmental attorney inside the U.S. Department of Justice. But the return of President Donald Trump to office last year marked the end of his government career. <\/p>\n<p>His departure was part of a mass exodus of civil servants across the federal government, including at the DOJ, in the beginning of the second Trump administration. Over the last year and half, thousands of career attorneys have exited the department, and many of its litigating divisions have been drastically downsized. The Civil Rights Division lost 70 percent of its attorneys within the first few months. The Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) lost more than a quarter of its workforce. <\/p>\n<p>In June, the Trump administration announced that it would be dropping the word \u201cenvironment\u201d and replacing it with \u201cenergy\u201d in a renamed Energy and Natural Resources Division with a re-tooled mission, \u201cadvancing U.S. energy dominance.\u201d Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson, the division\u2019s new head, said in an emailed statement that \u201cfaithfully\u201d enforcing environmental laws remains a central part of protecting \u201cclean air, water, and land for all Americans.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s nothing incompatible about unleashing American energy and making America healthy again. We are achieving both,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n<p>But half a dozen former ENRD attorneys tell a different story, citing a substantial decline in the division\u2019s enforcement of environmental laws and warning that this  \u201ccollapse,\u201d as one of those attorneys called it, threatens public health, the environment and the rule of law. <\/p>\n<p>In the first year of Trump\u2019s second term, the DOJ filed just 16 civil suits against polluters on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Environmental Integrity Project reported earlier this year. That number is an 81 percent drop from the first year of Trump\u2019s first term and 76 percent lower than the first year of the Biden administration. <\/p>\n<p>Matthew Nies, a DOJ spokesperson, noted a string of \u201csignificant environmental enforcement and defense work\u201d since the start of the second Trump administration, including a $100 million air pollution penalty won at trial against a coke plant near Detroit. The case was  by the prior administration.<\/p>\n<p>The former ENRD attorneys, and numerous environmental advocates, countered that the DOJ has named a former ExxonMobil attorney as the division\u2019s senior counsel, intervened on behalf of polluters and gone on offense for the fossil fuel industry, suing states over their climate policies and efforts to hold oil companies accountable. <\/p>\n<h2>Environmental Enforcement Section Chief Forced Out<\/h2>\n<p>Mariani initially came to the DOJ in 1986 through the department\u2019s Honors Program, a recruitment initiative for entry-level federal attorneys. During his time in the department, he worked on a wide range of pollution control and environmental cleanup cases, covering everything from wastewater treatment and Superfund sites to enforcing rules around emissions from coal-fired power plants. <\/p>\n<p>He even worked for five years as the lead supervisor on the U.S. government\u2019s litigation against oil major BP over the company\u2019s Deepwater Horizon oil spill. That case resulted in a record-breaking $20.8 billion settlement with BP in 2015 \u2014 the largest settlement with a single entity in the DOJ\u2019s history. <\/p>\n<p>Following the negotiation of this settlement, Mariani was named head of the Environmental Enforcement Section in 2016 \u2014 a position in which he served for almost 10 years, until he said he was forced out at the beginning of Trump\u2019s second term. <\/p>\n<p>The new administration had created what was called the Sanctuary Cities Enforcement Working Group, and he and other top-level managers at the DOJ were told they were being transferred there. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI had to decide whether I was going to stay with the department and take this new job, or leave,\u201d Mariani said in an interview. <\/p>\n<p>Four section chiefs within the environment division, including Mariani, were forced out of their jobs with the involuntary reassignments to this new working group. \u201cIt turned out more to be a way to get people out of the jobs they had,\u201d he told <em>Inside Climate News<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>Mariani spent a few days trying to better understand what the new assignment would entail. \u201cTo me it really seemed like sort of a fake job. It just didn\u2019t seem like a real thing. And so I decided for me, the better course was to leave.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mariani took his retirement and left the department in February 2025. <\/p>\n<p>The demise of environmental enforcement under the second Trump administration, Mariani said, is unprecedented. As he explained in a December 2025 article, the DOJ \u201cis rapidly moving away from enforcing the nation\u2019s core pollution control laws in ways not seen in prior administrations, including President Trump\u2019s first term.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>This shift, he wrote, is not just a mere change in priorities, but rather a \u201cdecision that will harm the rule of law and our environment.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>An Attorney Exodus<\/h2>\n<p>One year into Trump\u2019s second term, the DOJ\u2019s environment division had lost around a third of its lawyers, with at least 140 departures, according to Politico\u2019s E&amp;E News. \u201cThose departures have cost ENRD, which at the start of 2025 employed about 400 attorneys, hundreds of years of institutional knowledge,\u201d the news outlet reported in February. <\/p>\n<p>Gustafson acknowledged that the division has seen staff decreases over the last year and half. \u201cThis attrition does not prevent us from fulfilling our mission, but it forces us to focus our affirmative litigation on cases that will achieve the greatest practical benefit for the American people,\u201d he told <em>Inside Climate News<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>Sean Donahue, an environmental attorney at the firm Donahue, Goldberg, Herzog &amp; Davidson, worked at ENRD in the appellate section from 1997 through 2001. He currently teaches a summer course titled \u201cFederal Environmental Policy Under Trump II\u201d at Vermont Law and Graduate School, and during a recent online talk on that topic, he remarked on the significant downsizing of the ENRD workforce.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s massive, and a lot of that is in enforcement,\u201d Donahue said. \u201cThat is enough that it is materially going to affect their ability to do their job, at least as Congress conceived it.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>The Environmental Enforcement Section has indeed shrunken dramatically. Mariani said it is now down to less than half the size it was on the day that he left. \u201cIt probably takes the section down to a size of the lowest it\u2019s been in a few decades,\u201d he told <em>Inside Climate News<\/em>. <\/p>\n<p>Andrew Mergen, faculty director of Harvard University\u2019s environmental law and policy clinic, previously worked at ENRD for 33 years and finished his service there as chief of the appellate section. The division, like other parts of the federal government, was impacted by the Trump administration\u2019s DOGE cuts, he said, as many employees decided to leave or take buyout offers rather than risk staying on and being fired. DOJ attorneys who worked on environmental justice issues in particular \u201cwere essentially run out of the division,\u201d Mergen said. <\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration shuttered DOJ\u2019s Office of Environmental Justice in February 2025. The office was created in 2022 under Biden administration Attorney General Merrick Garland. <\/p>\n<p>Another section within ENRD that took a big hit in attorney departures is Environmental Crimes. Deborah Harris, who headed the section until her exit last year, said the section had 42 attorneys at its peak, and now it is down to half that size. \u201cThere was quite an exodus,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<h2>Involuntary Reassignments<\/h2>\n<p>Harris, along with Mariani and two other heads of litigating sections within ENRD, received involuntary transfers in the days following Trump\u2019s second inauguration. Their new assignment was with the sanctuary cities working group \u2014 a project that Harris said was \u201ca complete joke.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She and other top managers were sitting around with little substantive work on their hands. \u201cWe certainly were not litigating,\u201d Harris recalled. <\/p>\n<p>The group started up in February 2025, and by early May all but two of the attorneys, including Harris, had left. The last member of the working group departed by late August, leaving it with no members. The DOJ declined to confirm that the group has been dissolved or is no longer active, citing  general department policy not to comment on \u201cinner-departmental organization or function.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Mergen told <em>Inside Climate News<\/em> that the involuntary reassignments of some of ENRD\u2019s top section chiefs \u2014 including his successor, Jennifer Neumann, in the appellate section \u2014 was \u201cshocking.\u201d That shakeup, along with several other changes in the division within the first month of the new administration, prompted him along with two other ENRD alums to write a piece for the <em>Legal Planet<\/em> blog warning that the division \u201cfaces its most profound crisis since it was established in 1909.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>According to Harris, none of the four section chiefs who were reassigned have been replaced in terms of formal hiring. Deputy or assistant attorneys are now running those sections. <\/p>\n<h2>Collapse in Environmental Enforcement<\/h2>\n<p>In response to questions, Nies, the DOJ spokesperson, provided a list of ENRD enforcement successes that includes \u201cmajor civil settlements\u201d with a \u201cforever chemical\u201d manufacturer for water pollution, a grocery chain for coolant leaks and a steel mill for hazardous waste. <\/p>\n<p>Among other cases are an 18-month prison sentence for biofuel fraud; a $500,000 criminal penalty for asbestos violations; guilty pleas to environmental crimes by wastewater pretreatment managers, a yacht manufacturer, a wood product importer and a builder; and indictments related to a commercial incinerator, wildlife trafficking and the ship that crashed into Baltimore\u2019s Key Bridge. <\/p>\n<p>Data analyzed by independent watchdog groups, however, tells a different story. <\/p>\n<p>Like the Environmental Integrity Project, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) analyzed court records and  a \u201ccollapse\u201d of environmental enforcement under Trump II, with a sharp drop in civil cases settled by the DOJ that were referred by the EPA. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe shrinkage in DOJ\u2019s environmental docket should not be surprising. Buyouts, threatened layoffs, budget cuts, and transfers have already eliminated half of DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Section,\u201d PEER wrote in its January 2026 analysis. <\/p>\n<p>Laura Thoms, director of enforcement at Earthjustice who previously served for 19 years as an attorney at DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Section, said in a December 2025 blog post that environmental laws are meaningless without enforcement. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cCompanies can dump toxic waste like coal ash in our rivers, release more soot and smog, spew cancer-causing chemicals into the air, and basically cut every corner that saves them a dollar but costs the rest of us in medical bills, lower property values, and premature deaths,\u201d Thoms wrote. Under the current administration, she said that corporate polluters are being given a free pass to evade environmental rules.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1190\">Americans Placed $166B in Sports Bets in 2025 \u2014 Double Amount Spent on the Arts<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe administration has bent over backwards to help corporations escape their legal obligations,\u201d Thoms wrote, citing several examples.<\/p>\n<p>She pushed back against the DOJ\u2019s defense of its environmental enforcement record, telling <em>Inside Climate News<\/em> via email that \u201cfinishing a handful of cases largely developed, negotiated, and litigated under the Biden Administration hardly demonstrates a commitment to environmental enforcement.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo date, the Administration has hamstrung the ability of hardworking career staff to hold polluters accountable, blocking criminal investigations of Trump allies, pardoning convictions of Trump donors, and dismissing meritorious enforcement actions with prejudice,\u201d she added. <\/p>\n<p>As Thoms alluded to, in recent months the administration shut down a criminal investigation of potential Clean Water Act violations by coal companies run by the son of West Virginia Republican senator and Trump ally Jim Justice. As <em>ProPublica <\/em>reported, the move \u201cis part of a pattern of behavior at the top echelons of the DOJ to push cases against Trump\u2019s political adversaries and ease up on allies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trump himself also issued pardons earlier this month to nine people who had been convicted of crimes under the Clean Air Act related to installing or selling devices that defeat emissions controls on motor vehicles. Pursuing prosecutions for these defective devices used to be a priority, Harris said, but that is no longer the case under the current administration. The DOJ has now stopped criminal enforcement of the Clean Air Act in this area, The New York Times reported last month. <\/p>\n<p>Civil enforcement of bedrock environmental laws like the Clean Air Act does not appear to be of much interest to the current administration, either. In June, for example, the administration made the unusual move to intervene in a citizen suit brought by the NAACP under the Clean Air Act that challenges the use of gas turbines by Elon Musk\u2019s AI company, which have been operating at data centers in Mississippi without air pollution permits. The DOJ intervened on the side of the company, telling a federal court that the suit should be thrown out. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Department of Justice will not sit idly by while private organizations use environmental laws to undermine our national security,\u201d Gustafson said in a statement announcing the department\u2019s intervention in the suit. \u201cThis case reflects the important work of the Environment and Natural Resources Division to unleash American energy for the sake of innovation and security.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>A New Name and New Focus on Fossil Fuels<\/h2>\n<p>In a June 28 Wall Street Journal op-ed titled \u201cNew Name, New Mission at the Justice Department,\u201d Gustafson defended the administration\u2019s \u201cenergy dominance\u201d agenda. He describes some of the actions the division has taken in defense of \u201cunleashing\u201d coal, oil and gas, such as defending efforts to restart an offshore oil pipeline in California, an asserted oil and gas drilling exemption from the Endangered Species Act on national security grounds and emergency orders issued by the Department of Energy to keep coal plants online. <\/p>\n<p>The DOJ is also going on offense, suing states over their climate policies and efforts to hold oil companies accountable. <\/p>\n<p>Gustafson argues in the op-ed that these actions against states are starting to bear fruit. \u201cSeveral states that were considering climate superfund laws have backed o\ufb00. A federal court in California preliminarily enjoined California\u2019s enforcement of pre-empted electric vehicle mandates. And, at our urging, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, a case that could shut down the cottage industry of climate tort litigation around the country.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>ExxonMobil, one of the defendants in that climate tort case brought by Boulder, Colorado, which the Supreme Court will hear in its upcoming term, even has one of its own former lawyers now working inside the DOJ. <\/p>\n<p>Robert Levy, who spent 17 years at Exxon and served in a senior-level executive counsel role, left the company on July 12 and started working the next day as a senior counsel at the DOJ\u2019s newly renamed \u201cEnergy\u201d division. \u201cI\u2019m excited to contribute to the Administration\u2019s energy priorities and to our nation\u2019s environmental and legal landscape,\u201d Levy wrote on LinkedIn, E&amp;E News reported.<\/p>\n<p>Robert Weissman, co-president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said this move suggests that \u201cBig Oil\u2019s capture of the U.S. government is now complete.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cInstead of enforcing the nation\u2019s environmental laws, the new so-called Energy and Natural Resources Division at the Justice Department explicitly aims to abuse emergency powers to drive oil and gas production, override state environmental enforcement and generally serve at the beck and call of Big Oil,\u201d Weissman said in a statement. \u201cThe Justice Department that should be fighting to protect clean air and water and avert catastrophic climate change will now work on behalf of polluters to advance the poisoning of people and the planet.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>The DOJ declined to comment on Levy joining its newly renamed division. It also declined a request from <em>Inside Climate News<\/em> to interview Levy. <\/p>\n<p>Several former ENRD attorneys expressed concern and dismay about the division\u2019s name change. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt just makes me think we\u2019re going to be even more of a cover for the oil and gas industry,\u201d Harris said.<\/p>\n<p>Thoms said it reflects \u201ca whole-hearted embrace of [the division\u2019s] new mission to push fossil fuels and data centers instead of protecting human health and the environment.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis change seems to be directed at an audience of one, Trump, who has declared an energy emergency and is somewhat fixated on fossil fuels,\u201d said Mergen. \u201cYou don\u2019t want to tie yourself to these industries too closely, because that\u2019s not the job. The Justice Department\u2019s job is not to promote fossil fuel. It\u2019s to enforce laws and to defend agencies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Former DOJ attorneys also noted that the administration is promoting only certain types of energy while undermining others.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey\u2019re actually impeding the fastest-growing types of energy in the United States, which are solar and wind,\u201d Donahue told <em>Inside Climate News<\/em>. \u201cThey\u2019re not unleashing energy. They\u2019re trying to protect fossil generation and fossil development.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The DOJ\u2019s environment division has undergone several name changes over the course of its 100-plus-year history. Before the current rebrand, the most recent came in 1990, when the name changed from \u201cLand and Natural Resources\u201d to \u201cEnvironment and Natural Resources.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Although the word \u201cenvironment\u201d has now been dropped from the name, Gustafson argues that the \u201cdivision\u2019s charge to steward America\u2019s environment responsibly is unchanged.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mariani said that this seems like a \u201cvery hard argument to make.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019ve got to look at the resource allocations,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Gustafson told <em>Inside Climate News <\/em>that enforcement \u201cdepends on referrals from investigative agencies. It also depends on the work of committed attorneys.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is false to claim that ENRD is walking away from environmental enforcement,\u201d Gustafson added. \u201cSuch assertions are unfair to our hard-working enforcement lawyers who continue to litigate against polluters every day.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>But regardless of the work or dedication of the attorneys, Mariani said \u201cthe environment and the rule of law will suffer\u201d in the absence of adequate staffing and resources in the DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Section. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo the extent that any enforcement is happening at all, it is <em>despite <\/em>the actions of this administration and because of the tireless efforts of the public servants who have stayed to try to do the right thing against all odds,\u201d Thoms said. <\/p>\n<h2>Politicization and Loss of Credibility<\/h2>\n<p>Martin LaLonde, now a state representative in Vermont, worked at ENRD from 1996 to 2007 under both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. The division\u2019s work during that time, he said, was much less politicized, and attorneys had leeway to push back if they thought something they were told to defend was unlawful or was unlikely to hold up in court. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe were the attorney for the federal agencies, but we didn\u2019t have to defend whatever they told us to defend. We could explain that certain things were not defensible,\u201d LaLonde said. <\/p>\n<p>Now, by contrast, he said it seems like the division\u2019s work is guided by a political agenda set by the president through executive orders. \u201cIt\u2019s much more directed from above than what I experienced in the years I was there.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>He\u2019s personally  less worried about the name change \u201cthan just generally how it\u2019s being run, and being politicized.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Other ENRD alums that spoke with <em>Inside Climate News<\/em> shared his concern. They said the DOJ has lost credibility, including with judges and prospective job applicants. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cBased on conversations I\u2019ve had with my former colleagues, I think the applicant pool is much, much smaller at this point,\u201d said Paul Gormley, a former senior counsel at ENRD\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Section. <\/p>\n<p>Gustafson said in his emailed statement that ENRD is \u201chiring in our defensive and enforcement sections, and we continue to attract great lawyers who are proud to represent the United States.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>But former ENRD attorneys say that many law school graduates and other prospective candidates are largely refraining from applying for positions with the Trump DOJ. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI know there is a perception that the Justice Department is not a comfortable or safe place to accept employment now,\u201d Donahue said. \u201dIt is all about serving Trump instead of serving the people of the United States and the laws of the United States.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1188\">Citizens Bank Cuts Ties With Prison Companies After De-ICE Pressure Campaign<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Instead of enforcing environmental laws, it\u2019s suing states over their efforts to hold oil companies accountable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say - Smart Moving Home<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say - Smart Moving Home\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Instead of enforcing environmental laws, it\u2019s suing states over their efforts to hold oil companies accountable.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Smart Moving Home\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-28T19:08:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ec0d70042821fd684a174c8d0e8becfa\"},\"headline\":\"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-28T19:08:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194\"},\"wordCount\":3363,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194\",\"name\":\"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say - Smart Moving Home\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-28T19:08:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ec0d70042821fd684a174c8d0e8becfa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1919},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?p=1194#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Smart Moving Home\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ec0d70042821fd684a174c8d0e8becfa\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/smartmovinghome.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say - Smart Moving Home","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say - Smart Moving Home","og_description":"Instead of enforcing environmental laws, it\u2019s suing states over their efforts to hold oil companies accountable.","og_url":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194","og_site_name":"Smart Moving Home","article_published_time":"2026-07-28T19:08:45+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ec0d70042821fd684a174c8d0e8becfa"},"headline":"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say","datePublished":"2026-07-28T19:08:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194"},"wordCount":3363,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg","articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194","url":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194","name":"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say - Smart Moving Home","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-28T19:08:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ec0d70042821fd684a174c8d0e8becfa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/dce395de272c7a806f531a267bb54223.jpg","width":2560,"height":1919},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?p=1194#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DOJ\u2019s Environmental Enforcement Arm Has Been Captured by Industry, Critics Say"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/","name":"Smart Moving Home","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ec0d70042821fd684a174c8d0e8becfa","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/smartmovinghome.com"],"url":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1194"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1194\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartmovinghome.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}